Evidence-first coverage of how work actually gets done at scale — the process, tooling, and behavioural science behind performance.
Our productivity coverage is data-first. We audit the claims that drive the discourse — about remote work, about tools, about the shape of a healthy engineering culture — against public research and observable outcomes. Where the data disagrees with the vibes, we side with the data.
Editor's Picks
Both extremes of the remote-versus-office argument were wrong. We pulled four years of public engineering data — incident rates, code review depth, onboarding time — to answer what actually happened to software when the office emptied out.
Cursor, Claude Code, Replit Agent and the rest reframed the act of programming inside twelve months. We audited the shipping data — pull request size, review depth, incident rates — to ask whether the productivity gains are real, and what they cost.
Zero-trust is no longer a buzzword — it is the default security architecture for serious organizations. We map what production deployments actually look like, where they still fail, and what the emerging identity-first models add.
Latest
The review process is a crucial step in software development, but it can significantly slow down the development cycle. Every layer of review can make the process 10 times slower. This article explores the impact of reviews on productivity and DevOps.
Not every idea is worth implementing. Learn how to evaluate the pros and cons of a new system and make informed decisions. Discover the key factors to consider when deciding whether to implement a new project.
Discover a powerful CLI RSS reader that combines the simplicity of Taskwarrior with the flexibility of Git syncing. This innovative tool allows you to stay up-to-date with your favorite feeds from the comfort of your command line. Learn how to get started and streamline your news consumption.